According to MTV, Millar thinks the film is doing just fine. The film costs “$28 million after the U.K. tax breaks, and our U.K. and U.S. gross alone is already at $38 million as of last night.” Millar noted, “We were top Friday, Saturday and Sunday — which is amazing, considering we’re in the middle of a holiday season and up against 3-D competition with an R-rated superhero movie.”
He continued:
We’re looking at a very nice profit here and word of mouth is spectacular — the reviews being among the best I’ve ever seen — and so we’re all very proud to find ourselves in this position. Positive advance reviews had some people hoping for a $25 million domestic opening. I wanted ‘Avatar’ numbers myself, but as Matthew sensibly pointed out, we were made on a Tarantino budget and should be more than happy with Tarantino numbers.There’s a lot of insight in the Tarantino comparison. The budgets of Kick-Ass and Tarantino films are similar, and they both cater to pretty specific geek niches. While Inglorious Basterds had the benefit of Brad Pitt’s face to plaster all over its marketing materials, Kill Bill Vol. 1 only grossed $22 million on its opening weekend, a number very comparable to Kick-Ass.
I’m still not sure how this shakes out for Lionsgate, but it seems like Matthew Vaughn and Millar will do just fine. The film will be profitable, just not a monster hit as some in the online community had hoped. Unfortunately, with the box office juggernaut of Iron Man 2 rapidly approaching, it’s not looking good for a Kick-Ass sequel.
No comments:
Post a Comment